Xeon Gold 6136 vs Xeon Silver 4216

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6136 vs Xeon Silver 4216 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6136 vs Xeon Silver 4216: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6136

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Xeon Silver 4216

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,022 vs 21,049).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,011 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6136 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6136 better than Xeon Silver 4216?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6136 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6136 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6136 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6136 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Silver 4216 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6136 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,011 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Silver 4216 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4216 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon Gold 6136 vs Xeon Silver 4216 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6136

The Xeon Gold 6136 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,049 points. Launch price was $2,460.

Xeon Silver 4216

The Xeon Silver 4216 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,022 points. Launch price was $1,002.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6136 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4216 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Silver 4216 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6136 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4216 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6136 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6136 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4216 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6136 scores 21,049 against the Xeon Silver 4216's 21,022 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6136. L3 cache: 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6136 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Silver 4216.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6136	Xeon Silver 4216
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	16 / 32+33%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+16%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+43%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	24.75 MB+13%	22 MB
L2 Cache	12 MB	16 MB+33%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	21,049	21,022
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,013
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	12,286

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6136 versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon Silver 4216 — the Xeon Gold 6136 supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4216 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6136) and C620 (Xeon Silver 4216).

Feature	Xeon Gold 6136	Xeon Silver 4216
Socket	LGA3647	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2666+11%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	768 GB	1024 GB+33%
RAM Channels	6	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6136) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4216). Primary use case: Xeon Silver 4216 targets Server / Edge computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4216 rivals EPYC 7262.