Xeon E-2378G vs Xeon Gold 6136

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2378G vs Xeon Gold 6136 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2378G vs Xeon Gold 6136: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2378G

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 80W instead of 150W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6136

2017

Why buy it

✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,049 vs 21,153).
❌87.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2378G better than Xeon Gold 6136?

Yes. Xeon E-2378G is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 25.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2378G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2378G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2378G still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E-2378G comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2378G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E-2378G vs Xeon Gold 6136 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2378G

The Xeon E-2378G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,153 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6136

The Xeon Gold 6136 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,049 points. Launch price was $2,460.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2378G packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6136 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 6136 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2378G versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6136 — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2378G (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon E-2378G uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6136 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2378G scores 21,153 against the Xeon Gold 6136's 21,049 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E-2378G. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2378G vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6136.

Feature	Xeon E-2378G	Xeon Gold 6136
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+38%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	24.75 MB+55%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+4167%	12 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake-E (2021)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	21,153	21,049

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2378G uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6136 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.