Xeon E-2378G vs Xeon E5-2697 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2378G vs Xeon E5-2697 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2378G vs Xeon E5-2697 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2378G

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 80W instead of 145W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 45 MB).

Xeon E5-2697 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+181.3% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,990 vs 21,153).
❌81.3% higher power demand at 145W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2378G better than Xeon E5-2697 v4?

Yes. Xeon E-2378G is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 15.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2378G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2378G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2378G still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E-2378G comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2378G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 18/36. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E-2378G vs Xeon E5-2697 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2378G

The Xeon E-2378G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,153 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2697 v4

The Xeon E5-2697 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 20,990 points. Launch price was $2,702.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2378G packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2697 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2378G versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697 v4 — a 34.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2378G (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon E-2378G uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2378G scores 21,153 against the Xeon E5-2697 v4's 20,990 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E-2378G. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2378G vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2697 v4.

Feature	Xeon E-2378G	Xeon E5-2697 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+42%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+22%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	45 MB+181%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+11278%	4.5 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake-E (2021)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	21,153	20,990

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2378G uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2697 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.