Xeon E-2378G vs Xeon Silver 4216

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2378G vs Xeon Silver 4216 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2378G vs Xeon Silver 4216: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2378G

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 80W instead of 100W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Silver 4216

2019

Why buy it

✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,022 vs 21,153).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,011 MSRP, while Xeon E-2378G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌25% higher power demand at 100W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2378G better than Xeon Silver 4216?

Yes. Xeon E-2378G is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 25.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2378G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2378G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2378G is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Silver 4216 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E-2378G comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,011 MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Silver 4216 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2378G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E-2378G vs Xeon Silver 4216 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2378G

The Xeon E-2378G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,153 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4216

The Xeon Silver 4216 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,022 points. Launch price was $1,002.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2378G packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4216 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Silver 4216 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2378G versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4216 — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2378G (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E-2378G uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4216 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2378G scores 21,153 against the Xeon Silver 4216's 21,022 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E-2378G. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2378G vs 22 MB on the Xeon Silver 4216.

Feature	Xeon E-2378G	Xeon Silver 4216
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+59%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+33%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	22 MB+38%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+3100%	16 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake-E (2021)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	21,153	21,022
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,013
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	12,286

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2378G uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4216 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E-2378G	Xeon Silver 4216
Socket	LGA1200	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1024 GB
RAM Channels	—	6
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E-2378G) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4216). Primary use case: Xeon Silver 4216 targets Server / Edge computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4216 rivals EPYC 7262.