
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

Xeon Gold 6136
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Xeon Gold 6136 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Xeon Gold 6136 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Xeon Gold 6136: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 150W, a 144W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Xeon Gold 6136 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6136, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6136
2017Why buy it
- ✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,049 vs 21,287).
- ❌2400% higher power demand at 150W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U better than Xeon Gold 6136?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Xeon Gold 6136 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x-7500, DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 21,287 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6136
The Xeon Gold 6136 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,049 points. Launch price was $2,460.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6136 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 6136 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6136 — a 27.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U uses the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6136 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U scores 21,287 against the Xeon Gold 6136's 21,049 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6136.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U | Xeon Gold 6136 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+32% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+17% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 24.75 MB+55% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 12 MB+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 21,287+1% | 21,049 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U uses the FP7/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6136 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U versus 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6136 — the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6136 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 256 — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6136). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6136) — the Xeon Gold 6136 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U | Xeon Gold 6136 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+110% | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 768+200% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6136). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Xeon Gold 6136 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U | Xeon Gold 6136 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 760M | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












