Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Xeon E5-2673 v4

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Xeon E5-2673 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

6 / 12

21,287

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2673 v4

20 / 40

21,277

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Xeon E5-2673 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Xeon E5-2673 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 6W instead of 135W, a 129W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011-3 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Xeon E5-2673 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2673 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.

Xeon E5-2673 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,277 vs 21,287).
❌2150% higher power demand at 135W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U better than Xeon E5-2673 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2673 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FP7/FP8 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA2011-3, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 20/40. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Xeon E5-2673 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x-7500, DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 21,287 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2673 v4

The Xeon E5-2673 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,277 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon E5-2673 v4 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U versus 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2673 v4 — a 72.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U uses the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U scores 21,287 against the Xeon E5-2673 v4's 21,277 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2673 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U	Xeon E5-2673 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	20 / 40+233%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+113%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+52%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	50 MB+213%
L2 Cache	6 MB+20%	5 MB
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	21,287	21,277

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U uses the FP7/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 uses FCLGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U	Xeon E5-2673 v4
Socket	FP7/FP8	FCLGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	256	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U) / not specified (Xeon E5-2673 v4). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Xeon E5-2673 v4 requires a dedicated GPU.