Xeon Gold 6136 vs Xeon W-2155

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6136 vs Xeon W-2155 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6136 vs Xeon W-2155: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6136

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+80% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 14 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2155 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon W-2155

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 140W instead of 150W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,858 vs 21,049).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,440 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6136 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2155 better than Xeon Gold 6136?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-2155 is ahead with a 11.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6136 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 6136 also has the bigger cache pool with 80% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 14 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6136 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 80% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 14 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2155 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2155 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,440 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6136 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6136 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 80% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 14 MB), more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 10/20, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Gold 6136 vs Xeon W-2155 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6136

The Xeon Gold 6136 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,049 points. Launch price was $2,460.

Xeon W-2155

The Xeon W-2155 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,858 points. Launch price was $1,440.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6136 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-2155 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Gold 6136 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6136 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-2155 — a 19.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2155 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). Both are built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6136 scores 21,049 against the Xeon W-2155's 20,858 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6136. L3 cache: 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6136 vs 13.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2155.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6136	Xeon W-2155
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+20%	10 / 20
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.5 GHz+22%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.3 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	24.75 MB+80%	13.75 MB (total)
L2 Cache	12 MB+1100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	21,049	20,858

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 6136 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2155 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.