Xeon Gold 6138 vs Xeon Gold 6152

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6138 vs Xeon Gold 6152 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6138 vs Xeon Gold 6152: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6138

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,108 vs 24,287).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,612 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6152 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 6152

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6152 better than Xeon Gold 6138?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6152 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6152 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6152 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6138 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6152 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,612 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6138 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6152 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 22 cores / 44 threads instead of 20/40. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Gold 6138 vs Xeon Gold 6152 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6138

The Xeon Gold 6138 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,108 points. Launch price was $2,612.

Xeon Gold 6152

The Xeon Gold 6152 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30.25 MB. L2 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,287 points. Launch price was $3,655.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6138 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6152 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon Gold 6152 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6138 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6152 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6138 scores 24,108 against the Xeon Gold 6152's 24,287 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 6152. L3 cache: 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6138 vs 30.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6152.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6138	Xeon Gold 6152
Cores / Threads	20 / 40	22 / 44+10%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.1 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	27.5 MB	30.25 MB+10%
L2 Cache	20 MB	22 MB+10%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	24,108	24,287
Geekbench 6 Single	1,261	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,439	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 768 GB of RAM. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6138) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6152).

Feature	Xeon Gold 6138	Xeon Gold 6152
Socket	LGA3647	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	2666
Max RAM Capacity	768 GB	768 GB
RAM Channels	6	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6138 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6152 rivals EPYC 7451.