Xeon Gold 6138 vs Xeon Gold 6222V

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6138 vs Xeon Gold 6222V FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6138 vs Xeon Gold 6222V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6138

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,108 vs 24,254).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,612 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6222V mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 6222V

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 115W instead of 125W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6222V better than Xeon Gold 6138?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6138 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6222V pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6222V is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6222V is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6138 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6222V comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,612 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6138 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6138 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6222V makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 40 threads instead of 20/40. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Gold 6138 vs Xeon Gold 6222V Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6138

The Xeon Gold 6138 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,108 points. Launch price was $2,612.

Xeon Gold 6222V

The Xeon Gold 6222V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,254 points. Launch price was $1,600.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon Gold 6138 and Xeon Gold 6222V share an identical 20-core/40-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6138 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6222V — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6138 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6138 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6138 scores 24,108 against the Xeon Gold 6222V's 24,254 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6222V. Both processors carry 27.5 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6138	Xeon Gold 6222V
Cores / Threads	20 / 40	20 / 40
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+3%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+11%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	27.5 MB	27.5 MB
L2 Cache	20 MB	20 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	24,108	24,254
Geekbench 6 Single	1,261	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,439	—