
Xeon Gold 6138

Xeon W-1390
Xeon Gold 6138 vs Xeon W-1390 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Gold 6138 vs Xeon W-1390 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Gold 6138 vs Xeon W-1390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Gold 6138
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1390 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 48.4 PassMark/$ ($2,612 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 80W.
Xeon W-1390
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,118 less on MSRP ($494 MSRP vs $2,612 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 424.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 48.4 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($494 MSRP vs $2,612 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 125W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,902 vs 24,108).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-1390 better than Xeon Gold 6138?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6138 vs Xeon W-1390 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6138
The Xeon Gold 6138 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,108 points. Launch price was $2,612.

Xeon W-1390
The Xeon W-1390 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,902 points. Launch price was $494.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6138 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon W-1390 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 6138 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6138 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1390 — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1390 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6138 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-1390 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6138 scores 24,108 against the Xeon W-1390's 23,902 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6138. L3 cache: 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6138 vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1390.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6138 | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40+150% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 27.5 MB+72% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 20 MB+3900% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| PassMark | 24,108 | 23,902 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,261 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,439 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6138 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1390 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6138 | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 6 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6138) / not specified (Xeon W-1390). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6138 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6138 | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon Gold 6138 was priced at $2612, while the Xeon W-1390 came in at $494. On launch pricing ($2612 vs $494), Xeon W-1390 was $2118 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6138 delivers 9.2 pts/$ vs 48.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1390 — making the Xeon W-1390 the 135.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6138 | Xeon W-1390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2612 | $494-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2 | 48.4+426% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














