Xeon Gold 6140 vs Xeon Gold 6152

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6140 vs Xeon Gold 6152 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6140 vs Xeon Gold 6152: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6140

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,187 vs 24,287).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 30 MB).

Xeon Gold 6152

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+22.2% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 25 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6152 better than Xeon Gold 6140?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6152 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6152 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 22.2% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6152 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6152 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6152 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 22.2% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 25 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 22 cores / 44 threads instead of 18/36. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Gold 6140 vs Xeon Gold 6152 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6140

The Xeon Gold 6140 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,187 points. Launch price was $2,445.

Xeon Gold 6152

The Xeon Gold 6152 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30.25 MB. L2 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,287 points. Launch price was $3,655.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6140 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6152 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon Gold 6152 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6140 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6152 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6140 scores 24,187 against the Xeon Gold 6152's 24,287 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6152. L3 cache: 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6140 vs 30.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6152.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6140	Xeon Gold 6152
Cores / Threads	18 / 36	22 / 44+22%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+10%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	24.75 MB	30.25 MB+22%
L2 Cache	18 MB	22 MB+22%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	24,187	24,287

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to 2666 memory speed. Both support up to 768 of RAM. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6140) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6152).

Feature	Xeon Gold 6140	Xeon Gold 6152
Socket	LGA3647	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2666	2666
Max RAM Capacity	768	768
RAM Channels	6	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6140 rivals EPYC 7451; Xeon Gold 6152 rivals EPYC 7451.