Xeon Gold 6148 vs Xeon W-3245M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6148 vs Xeon W-3245M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6148 vs Xeon W-3245M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6148

2017

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $1,930 less on MSRP ($3,072 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
✅Delivers 65.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 5.7 PassMark/$ ($3,072 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 205W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon W-3245M

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 28 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 9.4 PassMark/$ ($5,002 MSRP vs $3,072 MSRP).
❌36.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3245M better than Xeon Gold 6148?

Yes. Xeon W-3245M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 21.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3245M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 21.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

There is no clear productivity winner in the data we have.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3245M is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6148 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-3245M comes in 62.8% more expensive on MSRP at $5,002 MSRP versus $3,072 MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6148 is also 65.8% better value on MSRP (9.4 vs 5.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3245M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon Gold 6148 vs Xeon W-3245M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6148

The Xeon Gold 6148 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 29,021 points. Launch price was $3,072.

Xeon W-3245M

The Xeon W-3245M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,494 points. Launch price was $5,002.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6148 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6148 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6148 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245M — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3245M (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6148 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-3245M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6148 scores 29,021 against the Xeon W-3245M's 28,494 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 6148. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,500 vs 18,500 (0% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,254 vs 1,474, a 16.1% lead for the Xeon W-3245M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,445 vs 11,572 (20.2% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). L3 cache: 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6148 vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245M.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6148	Xeon W-3245M
Cores / Threads	20 / 40+25%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.6 GHz+24%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	27.5 MB+25%	22 MB
L2 Cache	20 MB+25%	16 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	29,021+2%	28,494
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,500	18,500
Geekbench 6 Single	1,254	1,474+18%
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,445	11,572+23%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Gold 6148 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245M — the Xeon W-3245M supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3245M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6148) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245M) — the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon Gold 6148) and C621 (Xeon W-3245M).

Feature	Xeon Gold 6148	Xeon W-3245M
Socket	LGA3647	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity	768 GB	2048 GB+167%
RAM Channels	6	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	64+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6148 targets Legacy Enterprise Workloads, Xeon W-3245M targets Professional Workstation / Mac Pro. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6148 rivals EPYC 7401; Xeon W-3245M rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6148	Xeon W-3245M
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Legacy Enterprise Workloads	Professional Workstation / Mac Pro

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Gold 6148 was priced at $3072, while the Xeon W-3245M came in at $5002. On launch pricing ($3072 vs $5002), Xeon Gold 6148 was $1930 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6148 delivers 9.4 pts/$ vs 5.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3245M — making the Xeon Gold 6148 the 49.5% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6148	Xeon W-3245M
MSRP	$3072-39%	$5002
Performance per Dollar	9.4+65%	5.7
Release Date	2017	2019

Search Xeon Gold 6148 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3245M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.