Xeon Gold 6238 vs Xeon Gold 6248

Intel

Xeon Gold 6238

22 Cores44 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6248

20 Cores40 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

Xeon Gold 6238 vs Xeon Gold 6248 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6238 vs Xeon Gold 6248 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6238 vs Xeon Gold 6248: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6238

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 140W instead of 150W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6248 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (29,118 vs 29,535).

Xeon Gold 6248

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6248 better than Xeon Gold 6238?
Yes. Xeon Gold 6248 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6248 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6248 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6248 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6248 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6248 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Xeon Gold 6238 vs Xeon Gold 6248 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6238

The Xeon Gold 6238 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30.25 MB. L2 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 29,118 points. Launch price was $2,612.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6248

The Xeon Gold 6248 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 29,535 points. Launch price was $3,072.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6238 packs 22 cores / 44 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6248 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6238 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6238 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6248 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6248 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). Both are built on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6238 scores 29,118 against the Xeon Gold 6248's 29,535 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6248. L3 cache: 30.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6238 vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6248.

FeatureXeon Gold 6238Xeon Gold 6248
Cores / Threads
22 / 44+10%
20 / 40
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz+5%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz+19%
L3 Cache
30.25 MB+10%
27.5 MB
L2 Cache
22 MB+10%
20 MB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
29,118
29,535+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
19,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,327
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,277
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to 2933 memory speed. Both support up to 1024 GB of RAM. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6238) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6248).

FeatureXeon Gold 6238Xeon Gold 6248
Socket
LGA3647
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2933
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
1024 GB
1024 GB
RAM Channels
6
6
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6238) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6248). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6248 targets General Purpose Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6238 rivals EPYC 7402; Xeon Gold 6248 rivals EPYC 7352.

FeatureXeon Gold 6238Xeon Gold 6248
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
General Purpose Enterprise Server