Xeon Gold 6314U vs Xeon W-3345

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6314U vs Xeon W-3345 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6314U vs Xeon W-3345: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6314U

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Draws 205W instead of 250W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3345 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($2,977 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Xeon W-3345

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $478 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $2,977 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $2,977 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (48,140 vs 48,916).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 48 MB).
❌22% higher power demand at 250W vs 205W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6314U better than Xeon W-3345?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-3345 is ahead with a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6314U pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 6314U also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6314U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6314U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-3345 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6314U comes in 19.1% more expensive on MSRP at $2,977 MSRP versus $2,499 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W-3345 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-3345 is also 17.2% better value on MSRP (19.3 vs 16.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6314U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 36 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 24/48. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Gold 6314U vs Xeon W-3345 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6314U

The Xeon Gold 6314U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,916 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3345

The Xeon W-3345 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,140 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6314U packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon W-3345 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6314U has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6314U versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3345 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3345 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6314U uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon W-3345 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6314U scores 48,916 against the Xeon W-3345's 48,140 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6314U. L3 cache: 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6314U vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3345.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6314U	Xeon W-3345
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+33%	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	4 GHz+18%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	48 MB (total)+33%	36 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	10 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-SP (2021)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	48,916+2%	48,140

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA4189 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (Xeon Gold 6314U) and SP3,C621A (Xeon W-3345).

Feature	Xeon Gold 6314U	Xeon W-3345
Socket	LGA4189	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6314U rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon W-3345 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6314U	Xeon W-3345
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Gold 6314U was priced at $2977, while the Xeon W-3345 came in at $2499. On launch pricing ($2977 vs $2499), Xeon W-3345 was $478 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6314U delivers 16.4 pts/$ vs 19.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3345 — making the Xeon W-3345 the 15.9% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6314U	Xeon W-3345
MSRP	$2977	$2499-16%
Performance per Dollar	16.4	19.3+18%
Release Date	2021	2021

Search Xeon Gold 6314U on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3345 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.