Xeon Platinum 8153
VS
Ryzen AI Max 385

Xeon Platinum 8153 vs Ryzen AI Max 385

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8153

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Ryzen AI Max 385

8 Cores16 Thrd55 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8153

#290
Xeon Gold 5420+
MSRP: $1848|Avg: $1848
106%
#292
Xeon w7-2575X
MSRP: $1689|Avg: $1860
105%
#294
Xeon Gold 6444Y
MSRP: $3622|Avg: N/A
105%
#295
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
MSRP: $2649|Avg: $2782
104%
#296
Xeon Platinum 8380
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $965
104%
#297
EPYC 7453
MSRP: $1570|Avg: $1253
104%
#298
Xeon Gold 5418Y
MSRP: $1483|Avg: N/A
103%
#299
Xeon w5-3425
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $1189
102%
#300
EPYC 9255
MSRP: $2495|Avg: $1934
102%
#301
EPYC 8324P
MSRP: $1895|Avg: $3598
101%
#302
Xeon Gold 6414U
MSRP: $2296|Avg: $283
101%
#303
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
MSRP: $2495|Avg: $2495
101%
#304
EPYC 7352
MSRP: $1350|Avg: $725
101%
#305
Xeon Platinum 8153
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#305
Xeon w7-2475X
MSRP: $1789|Avg: $2544
100%
#307
Xeon W-3323
MSRP: $949|Avg: $500
99%
#308
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $100
98%
#309
Xeon W-2255
MSRP: $778|Avg: $350
97%
#310
Xeon Silver 4316
MSRP: $1126|Avg: $1200
97%
#311
Xeon w7-3545
MSRP: $2039|Avg: $2039
96%
#312
EPYC 7643P
MSRP: $2722|Avg: $2722
95%
#313
Xeon w5-3435X
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $163
95%
#314
Xeon Gold 6312U
MSRP: $1645|Avg: N/A
95%
#315
EPYC 7443
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $1800
95%
#316
Xeon Gold 6416H
MSRP: $1845|Avg: N/A
95%
#318
EPYC 7343
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $1350
94%
#319
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $225
93%
#320
EPYC 7413
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $450
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen AI Max 385 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon Platinum 8153Ryzen AI Max 385
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon Platinum 8153 (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon Platinum 8153Ryzen AI Max 385
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8153 and Ryzen AI Max 385

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8153

The Xeon Platinum 8153 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 32,180 points. Launch price was $3,115.

AMD

Ryzen AI Max 385

The Ryzen AI Max 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,274 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8153 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8153 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8153 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 385 — a 56.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 385 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8153 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8153 scores 32,180 against the Ryzen AI Max 385's 32,274 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 385. L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8153 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 385.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8153Ryzen AI Max 385
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
5 GHz+79%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.6 GHz+80%
L3 Cache
22 MB
32 MB (total)+45%
L2 Cache
16 MB+1500%
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
4 nm-71%
Architecture
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark
32,180
32,274
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8153 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8153 versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI Max 385 — the Xeon Platinum 8153 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8153 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 128 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8153) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max 385). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8153) vs 20 (Ryzen AI Max 385) — the Xeon Platinum 8153 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Platinum 8153) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max 385).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8153Ryzen AI Max 385
Socket
LGA3647
FP11
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
2666+53220%
LPDDR5x-8000
Max RAM Capacity
768
128 GB+17476167%
RAM Channels
6+50%
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
48+140%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max 385 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8153) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max 385). The Ryzen AI Max 385 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 8050S), while the Xeon Platinum 8153 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI Max 385 targets High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 385 rivals Core Ultra 9 285H.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8153Ryzen AI Max 385
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Radeon 8050S
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop