Xeon Platinum 8153 vs Xeon Platinum 8168

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Platinum 8153 vs Xeon Platinum 8168 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Platinum 8153 vs Xeon Platinum 8168: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Platinum 8153

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8168 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (32,180 vs 32,373).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 33 MB).

Xeon Platinum 8168

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 22 MB).

Trade-offs

❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8168 better than Xeon Platinum 8153?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8168 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8168 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8168 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8168 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Platinum 8168 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8168 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 22 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Platinum 8153 vs Xeon Platinum 8168 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Platinum 8153

The Xeon Platinum 8153 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 32,180 points. Launch price was $3,115.

Xeon Platinum 8168

The Xeon Platinum 8168 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 32,373 points. Launch price was $5,890.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8153 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8168 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8168 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8153 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8168 — a 27.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8168 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). Both are built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8153 scores 32,180 against the Xeon Platinum 8168's 32,373 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8168. L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8153 vs 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8168.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8153	Xeon Platinum 8168
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.7 GHz+32%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.7 GHz+35%
L3 Cache	22 MB	33 MB+50%
L2 Cache	16 MB	24 MB+50%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	32,180	32,373

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to 2666 memory speed. Both support up to 768 of RAM. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Platinum 8153) and C621 (Xeon Platinum 8168).

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8153	Xeon Platinum 8168
Socket	LGA3647	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2666	2666
Max RAM Capacity	768	768
RAM Channels	6	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8168 rivals EPYC 7501.