Ryzen AI Max 385
VS
Xeon Platinum 8153

Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Xeon Platinum 8153

AMD

Ryzen AI Max 385

8 Cores16 Thrd55 WWMax: 5 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8153

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8153

#290
Xeon Gold 5420+
MSRP: $1848|Avg: $1848
106%
#292
Xeon w7-2575X
MSRP: $1689|Avg: $1860
105%
#294
Xeon Gold 6444Y
MSRP: $3622|Avg: N/A
105%
#295
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
MSRP: $2649|Avg: $2782
104%
#296
Xeon Platinum 8380
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $965
104%
#297
EPYC 7453
MSRP: $1570|Avg: $1253
104%
#298
Xeon Gold 5418Y
MSRP: $1483|Avg: N/A
103%
#299
Xeon w5-3425
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $1189
102%
#300
EPYC 9255
MSRP: $2495|Avg: $1934
102%
#301
EPYC 8324P
MSRP: $1895|Avg: $3598
101%
#302
Xeon Gold 6414U
MSRP: $2296|Avg: $283
101%
#303
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
MSRP: $2495|Avg: $2495
101%
#304
EPYC 7352
MSRP: $1350|Avg: $725
101%
#305
Xeon Platinum 8153
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#305
Xeon w7-2475X
MSRP: $1789|Avg: $2544
100%
#307
Xeon W-3323
MSRP: $949|Avg: $500
99%
#308
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $100
98%
#309
Xeon W-2255
MSRP: $778|Avg: $350
97%
#310
Xeon Silver 4316
MSRP: $1126|Avg: $1200
97%
#311
Xeon w7-3545
MSRP: $2039|Avg: $2039
96%
#312
EPYC 7643P
MSRP: $2722|Avg: $2722
95%
#313
Xeon w5-3435X
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $163
95%
#314
Xeon Gold 6312U
MSRP: $1645|Avg: N/A
95%
#315
EPYC 7443
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $1800
95%
#316
Xeon Gold 6416H
MSRP: $1845|Avg: N/A
95%
#318
EPYC 7343
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $1350
94%
#319
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $225
93%
#320
EPYC 7413
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $450
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen AI Max 385 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen AI Max 385Xeon Platinum 8153
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon Platinum 8153 (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen AI Max 385Xeon Platinum 8153
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max 385 and Xeon Platinum 8153

AMD

Ryzen AI Max 385

The Ryzen AI Max 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,274 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8153

The Xeon Platinum 8153 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 32,180 points. Launch price was $3,115.

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI Max 385 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8153 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8153 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 385 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8153 — a 56.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 385 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max 385 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8153 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 32,274 against the Xeon Platinum 8153's 32,180 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 385. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 385 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8153.

FeatureRyzen AI Max 385Xeon Platinum 8153
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock
5 GHz+79%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+80%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+45%
22 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
16 MB+1500%
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Strix Halo (2025)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
32,274
32,180
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI Max 385 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8153 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI Max 385 versus 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8153 — the Xeon Platinum 8153 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8153 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 128 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen AI Max 385) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8153). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen AI Max 385) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8153) — the Xeon Platinum 8153 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max 385) and C621 (Xeon Platinum 8153).

FeatureRyzen AI Max 385Xeon Platinum 8153
Socket
FP11
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-8000
2666+53220%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+17476167%
768
RAM Channels
4
6+50%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
48+140%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max 385 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max 385) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8153). The Ryzen AI Max 385 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 8050S), while the Xeon Platinum 8153 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI Max 385 targets High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 385 rivals Core Ultra 9 285H.

FeatureRyzen AI Max 385Xeon Platinum 8153
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon 8050S
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop