
Core Ultra 5 245T vs Ryzen AI Max 385

Core Ultra 5 245T

Ryzen AI Max 385
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 245T
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 5 245T | Ryzen AI Max 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($270) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 5 245T | Ryzen AI Max 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($270) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 245T and Ryzen AI Max 385

Core Ultra 5 245T
The Core Ultra 5 245T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 32,444 points. Launch price was $270.

Ryzen AI Max 385
The Ryzen AI Max 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,274 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 245T packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 245T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245T versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 385 — a 2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245T (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245T scores 32,444 against the Ryzen AI Max 385's 32,274 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245T. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245T vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 385.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245T | Ryzen AI Max 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+2% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+64% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 32,444 | 32,274 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 14,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 245T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 245T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 245T) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max 385). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245T | Ryzen AI Max 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | LPDDR5x-8000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI Max 385 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI Max 385 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max 385). Both include integrated graphics — Arc Xe-LPG 64EU (Core Ultra 5 245T) and Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max 385) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 245T targets Desktop Low Power, Ryzen AI Max 385 targets High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 385 rivals Core Ultra 9 285H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245T | Ryzen AI Max 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Arc Xe-LPG 64EU | Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop Low Power | High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 5 245T launched at $270 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 debuted at $0. At current prices ($270 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max 385 is $270 cheaper.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245T | Ryzen AI Max 385 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $270 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $270 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 120.2 | — |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















