Core Ultra 5 245T vs Ryzen AI Max 385

Core Ultra 5 245T vs Ryzen AI Max 385 Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 5 245T

14 / 14

32,444

+0.5%

32,274

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 245T vs Ryzen AI Max 385 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 245T vs Ryzen AI Max 385: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 245T

2025

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $270 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen AI Max 385.

Ryzen AI Max 385

2025

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core Ultra 5 245T.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (32,274 vs 32,444).

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 245T better than Ryzen AI Max 385?

Yes. Core Ultra 5 245T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 245T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 245T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 245T is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 5 245T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $270 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (120.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max 385 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core Ultra 5 245T vs Ryzen AI Max 385 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 245T

The Core Ultra 5 245T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 32,444 points. Launch price was $270.

Ryzen AI Max 385

The Ryzen AI Max 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,274 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 245T packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 245T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245T versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 385 — a 2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245T (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245T scores 32,444 against the Ryzen AI Max 385's 32,274 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245T. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245T vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 385.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245T	Ryzen AI Max 385
Cores / Threads	14 / 14+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+2%	5 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+64%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	3 MB (per core)+200%	1 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm-25%	4 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	32,444	32,274
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	14,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 245T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245T versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI Max 385 — the Ryzen AI Max 385 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 245T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 245T) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max 385). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245T	Ryzen AI Max 385
Socket	LGA1851	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	LPDDR5x-8000+25%
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB+100%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max 385 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI Max 385 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max 385). Both include integrated graphics — Arc Xe-LPG 64EU (Core Ultra 5 245T) and Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max 385) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 245T targets Desktop Low Power, Ryzen AI Max 385 targets High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 385 rivals Core Ultra 9 285H.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245T	Ryzen AI Max 385
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Arc Xe-LPG 64EU	Radeon 8050S
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Desktop Low Power	High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core Ultra 5 245T was priced at $270, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($270 vs $0), Ryzen AI Max 385 was $270 cheaper.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 245T	Ryzen AI Max 385
MSRP	$270	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	120.2	—
Release Date	2025	2025

Search Core Ultra 5 245T on Amazon

Search Ryzen AI Max 385 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.