Core Ultra 5 245T vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

Intel

Core Ultra 5 245T

14 Cores14 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
Core Ultra family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

12 Cores24 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
Similar parts
·······

Core Ultra 5 245T vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 245T vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 245T vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 245T

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Costs $230 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 82.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.2 vs 65.7 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (32,444 vs 32,841).
  • 132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

2025

Why buy it

  • +1.2% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 65.7 vs 120.2 PassMark/$ ($500 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 better than Core Ultra 5 245T?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Ultra 5 245T is ahead with a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Core Ultra 5 245T also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core Ultra 5 245T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 comes in 85.2% more expensive on MSRP at $500 MSRP versus $270 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core Ultra 5 245T is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core Ultra 5 245T is also 82.9% better value on MSRP (120.2 vs 65.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core Ultra 5 245T vs Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 245T

The Core Ultra 5 245T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 32,444 points. Launch price was $270.

AMD

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,841 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 245T packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 5 245T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245T versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 uses Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245T scores 32,444 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370's 32,841 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245T vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 245TRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
Cores / Threads
14 / 14+17%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz
5.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+10%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+50%
16 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)+200%
1 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-25%
4 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Strix Point-HX PRO (Zen 5/5c) (2025)
PassMark
32,444
32,841+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 245T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245T versus LPDDR5X-8000 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 245T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 245TRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
Socket
LGA1851
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
LPDDR5X-8000+25%
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+300%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370). Both include integrated graphics Arc Xe-LPG 64EU (Core Ultra 5 245T) and Radeon 890M (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 245T targets Desktop Low Power, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 targets Mobile Workstation / AI.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 245TRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc Xe-LPG 64EU
Radeon 890M
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop Low Power
Mobile Workstation / AI
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core Ultra 5 245T was priced at $270, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 came in at $500. On launch pricing ($270 vs $500), Core Ultra 5 245T was $230 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 245T delivers 120.2 pts/$ vs 65.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 — making the Core Ultra 5 245T the 58.6% better value option.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 245TRyzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP
$270-46%
$500
Performance per Dollar
120.2+83%
65.7
Release Date
2025
2025

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.