Core Ultra 5 245T vs M4 Pro (12 cores)
Core Ultra 5 245T
M4 Pro (12 cores)
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 245T
Performance Per Dollar M4 Pro (12 cores)
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 5 245T | M4 Pro (12 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($270) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 5 245T | M4 Pro (12 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($270) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 245T and M4 Pro (12 cores)
Core Ultra 5 245T
The Core Ultra 5 245T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 32,444 points. Launch price was $270.
M4 Pro (12 cores)
The M4 Pro (12 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.592 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 32,853 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 245T packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the M4 Pro (12 cores) offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 245T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245T versus 4.51 GHz on the M4 Pro (12 cores) — a 12.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245T (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.592 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245T is built on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245T scores 32,444 against the M4 Pro (12 cores)'s 32,853 — a 1.3% lead for the M4 Pro (12 cores).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245T | M4 Pro (12 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14+17% | 12 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+13% | 4.51 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.592 GHz+18% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 4 MB+33% |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 32,444 | 32,853+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,904 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,812 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 20,076 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 245T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M4 Pro (12 cores) uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 245T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 245T) vs 1 (M4 Pro (12 cores)). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 245T) vs 0 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) — the Core Ultra 5 245T offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245T | M4 Pro (12 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | LPDDR5x-8000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+300% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245T) vs Apple Virtualization (M4 Pro (12 cores)). Both include integrated graphics — Arc Xe-LPG 64EU (Core Ultra 5 245T) and M4 Pro 16-core GPU (M4 Pro (12 cores)) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 245T targets Desktop Low Power, M4 Pro (12 cores) targets High-end Content Creation. Direct competitor: M4 Pro (12 cores) rivals Ryzen 9 8945HS.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245T | M4 Pro (12 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Arc Xe-LPG 64EU | M4 Pro 16-core GPU |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Apple Virtualization |
| Target Use | Desktop Low Power | High-end Content Creation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 5 245T and M4 Pro (12 cores)
