Ryzen AI Max 385
VS
Xeon Gold 6254

Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Xeon Gold 6254

AMD

Ryzen AI Max 385

8 Cores16 Thrd55 WWMax: 5 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6254

18 Cores36 Thrd200 WWMax: 4 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6254

#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
155%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
120%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
119%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
109%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
109%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
105%
#25
Xeon Gold 6254
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen AI Max 385 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen AI Max 385Xeon Gold 6254
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon Gold 6254 (2019) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2933, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen AI Max 385Xeon Gold 6254
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max 385 and Xeon Gold 6254

AMD

Ryzen AI Max 385

The Ryzen AI Max 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,274 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6254

The Xeon Gold 6254 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 32,334 points. Launch price was $3,803.

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI Max 385 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6254 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 6254 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 385 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6254 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 385 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max 385 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6254 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 32,274 against the Xeon Gold 6254's 32,334 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6254. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 21,000 (24% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6254). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 1,365, a 68.9% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 10,950 (24.4% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 385). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 385 vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6254.

FeatureRyzen AI Max 385Xeon Gold 6254
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock
5 GHz+25%
4 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+16%
3.1 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+29%
24.75 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
18 MB+1700%
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Strix Halo (2025)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
32,274
32,334
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
21,000+27%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800+105%
1,365
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,000+28%
10,950
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI Max 385 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6254 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI Max 385 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6254 — the Ryzen AI Max 385 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6254 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen AI Max 385) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6254). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen AI Max 385) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6254) — the Xeon Gold 6254 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max 385) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6254).

FeatureRyzen AI Max 385Xeon Gold 6254
Socket
FP11
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-8000+25%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels
4
6+50%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
48+140%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max 385 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max 385) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6254). The Ryzen AI Max 385 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 8050S), while the Xeon Gold 6254 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI Max 385 targets High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop, Xeon Gold 6254 targets Enterprise Server / Database. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 385 rivals Core Ultra 9 285H; Xeon Gold 6254 rivals EPYC 7302.

FeatureRyzen AI Max 385Xeon Gold 6254
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon 8050S
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop
Enterprise Server / Database