Xeon Platinum 8160
VS
Core 9 270H

Xeon Platinum 8160 vs Core 9 270H

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8160

24 Cores48 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core 9 270H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.8 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8160

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
452%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
3%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
8%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
8%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
7%
#4
Xeon Platinum 8160
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
7%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
85%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
76%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
59%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
58%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 9 270H

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
124%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
116%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
114%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
109%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
104%
#21
Core 9 270H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
94%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
88%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core 9 270H (2024) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon Platinum 8160Core 9 270H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon Platinum 8160 (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon Platinum 8160Core 9 270H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8160 and Core 9 270H

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8160

The Xeon Platinum 8160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,989 points. Launch price was $4,702.

Intel

Core 9 270H

The Core 9 270H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,793 points. Launch price was $697.

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8160 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core 9 270H offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8160 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8160 versus 5.8 GHz on the Core 9 270H — a 44.2% clock advantage for the Core 9 270H (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8160 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 9 270H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8160 scores 28,989 against the Core 9 270H's 28,793 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8160. L3 cache: 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8160 vs 24 MB (total) on the Core 9 270H.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8160Core 9 270H
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+71%
14 / 20
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
5.8 GHz+57%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.7 GHz+29%
L3 Cache
33 MB+38%
24 MB (total)
L2 Cache
24 MB+1100%
2 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
PassMark
28,989
28,793
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8160 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 9 270H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8160 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core 9 270H — the Xeon Platinum 8160 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8160 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 96 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8160) vs 2 (Core 9 270H). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8160) vs 20 (Core 9 270H) — the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Platinum 8160) and Mobile platform (Core 9 270H).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8160Core 9 270H
Socket
LGA3647
FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
2666+53220%
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
768
96 GB+13107100%
RAM Channels
6+200%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
48+140%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core 9 270H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8160 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core 9 270H includes integrated graphics (Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs)), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 9 270H targets Extreme Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8160 rivals EPYC 7451; Core 9 270H rivals Ryzen 9 9900H.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8160Core 9 270H
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs)
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Extreme Gaming Laptop