
Xeon Platinum 8160

Xeon Silver 4510T
Xeon Platinum 8160 vs Xeon Silver 4510T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Platinum 8160 vs Xeon Silver 4510T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Platinum 8160 vs Xeon Silver 4510T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Platinum 8160
2017Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (28,989 vs 29,119).
- β30.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 115W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4510T moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Silver 4510T
2023Why buy it
- β +0.4% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 115W instead of 150W, a 35W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- β 66.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8160 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Silver 4510T better than Xeon Platinum 8160?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Platinum 8160 vs Xeon Silver 4510T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Platinum 8160
The Xeon Platinum 8160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017β2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,989 points. Launch price was $4,702.

Xeon Silver 4510T
The Xeon Silver 4510T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 29,119 points. Launch price was $624.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8160 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4510T offers 12 cores / 24 threads β the Xeon Platinum 8160 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8160 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4510T β identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8160 uses the Skylake (server) (2017β2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4510T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8160 scores 28,989 against the Xeon Silver 4510T's 29,119 β a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Silver 4510T. L3 cache: 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8160 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4510T.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8160 | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+100% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+5% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB+10% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017β2018) | Sapphire Rapids (2023β2024) |
| PassMark | 28,989 | 29,119 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 11,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8160 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4510T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8160 versus DDR5-4400 on the Xeon Silver 4510T β the Xeon Silver 4510T supports 65% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4510T supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB β 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8160) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4510T). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8160) vs 80 (Xeon Silver 4510T) β the Xeon Silver 4510T offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Platinum 8160) and C741 (Xeon Silver 4510T).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8160 | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | DDR5-4400+65% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 GB | 4096 GB+433% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 80+67% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8160) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4510T). Primary use case: Xeon Silver 4510T targets Enterprise Storage / Edge Computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8160 rivals EPYC 7451; Xeon Silver 4510T rivals EPYC 8124.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8160 | Xeon Silver 4510T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | β |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | β | Enterprise Storage / Edge Computing |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














