Xeon Platinum 8160
VS
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Xeon Platinum 8160 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8160

24 Cores48 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

16 Cores32 Thrd180 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8160

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
452%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
3%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
8%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
8%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
7%
#4
Xeon Platinum 8160
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
7%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
85%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
76%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
59%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
58%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

#316
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1400
109%
#317
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
109%
#318
Core i3-10305T
MSRP: $143|Avg: $143
109%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
107%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
107%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
107%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
106%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
105%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
103%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
103%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
103%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
102%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
102%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
101%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
100%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
100%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
99%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
97%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
96%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
96%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
95%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
95%
#339
Core i5-8500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $149
95%
#340
Core i9-9900KF
MSRP: $488|Avg: $350
94%
#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
94%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
93%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
91%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
90%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
90%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Xeon Platinum 8160 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightXeon Platinum 8160Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($540)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (ZEN+ (2018−2019) / 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightXeon Platinum 8160Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($540)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8160 and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8160

The Xeon Platinum 8160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,989 points. Launch price was $4,702.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 29,462 points. Launch price was $899.

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8160 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8160 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8160 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8160 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8160 scores 28,989 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X's 29,462 — a 1.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. L3 cache: 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8160 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8160Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+50%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz+19%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.5 GHz+67%
L3 Cache
33 MB+3%
32 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB+4700%
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
12 nm-14%
Architecture
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
ZEN+ (2018−2019)
PassMark
28,989
29,462+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi
21,444
Geekbench 6 Single
1,255
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,814
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8160 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8160 versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X — the Xeon Platinum 8160 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8160 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 256 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8160) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8160) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Platinum 8160) and Socket TR4 / X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8160Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Socket
LGA3647
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
2666+66550%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
768
256 GB+34952433%
RAM Channels
6+50%
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
48
64+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8160 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8160) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2950X). Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8160 rivals EPYC 7451.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8160Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V