Xeon Platinum 8270 vs EPYC 4364P
Xeon Platinum 8270
EPYC 4364P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8270
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4364P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8270 | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,405) | ✅ More affordable ($334) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake-SP (2018) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8270 | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2158%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,405) | ✅ More affordable ($334) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8270 and EPYC 4364P
Xeon Platinum 8270
The Xeon Platinum 8270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,602 points. Launch price was $7,405.
EPYC 4364P
The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8270 packs 26 cores / 52 threads, while the EPYC 4364P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8270 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8270 versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P — a 29.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 2.7 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8270 uses the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 4364P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8270 scores 33,602 against the EPYC 4364P's 34,215 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 4364P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 32,000 vs 21,000 (41.5% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8270). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,200 vs 3,085, a 88% lead for the EPYC 4364P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 15,594 (34.5% advantage for the EPYC 4364P). L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8270 vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4364P.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8270 | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 26 / 52+225% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 4.5 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 35.75 MB (total)+12% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 33,602 | 34,215+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 32,000+52% | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,200 | 3,085+157% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,000 | 15,594+42% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8270 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 4364P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8270 versus DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4364P — the EPYC 4364P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8270 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8270) vs 2 (EPYC 4364P). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8270) vs 28 (EPYC 4364P) — the Xeon Platinum 8270 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8270) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8270 | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB+433% | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 48+71% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8270) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P). The EPYC 4364P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8270 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8270 targets Server / Workstation, EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8270 rivals Xeon Platinum 8268; EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8270 | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | Server / Workstation | Entry Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8270 launched at $7405 MSRP, while the EPYC 4364P debuted at $399.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8270 | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7405 | $399-95% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $334 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Platinum 8270 and EPYC 4364P
