Xeon Platinum 8270
VS
Xeon D-2799

Xeon Platinum 8270 vs Xeon D-2799

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8270

26 Cores52 Thrd205 WWMax: 4 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon D-2799

20 Cores40 Thrd129 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8270

#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
128%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
110%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
106%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
106%
#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
101%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
100%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
100%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
97%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
96%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
94%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
90%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
89%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
87%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
76%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
74%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon D-2799

#372
Xeon Gold 6330
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $2128
115%
#373
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
115%
#374
Xeon Gold 6448H
MSRP: $3658|Avg: N/A
115%
#375
Xeon D-2766NT
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $212
114%
#376
Xeon Gold 6442Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
114%
#377
Xeon 6740P
MSRP: $4650|Avg: $4650
114%
#378
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
MSRP: $7999|Avg: $7999
113%
#379
Xeon W-3345
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $3319
112%
#380
Xeon Gold 6526Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
111%
#382
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
MSRP: $3995|Avg: N/A
109%
#383
EPYC 7551P
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $329
106%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
MSRP: $7349|Avg: $7999
106%
#385
EPYC 9375F
MSRP: $5306|Avg: $108
105%
#386
Xeon w9-3475X
MSRP: $3739|Avg: $3930
102%
#387
Xeon D-2799
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#388
EPYC 9254
MSRP: $3761|Avg: $1099
100%
#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
100%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
99%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
99%
#392
EPYC 9374F
MSRP: $4850|Avg: $3466
99%
#393
Xeon Gold 6448Y
MSRP: $3583|Avg: N/A
98%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
98%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
98%
#396
Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
97%
#397
Xeon W-3235
MSRP: $1538|Avg: $1538
97%
#398
Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6000
97%
#399
Xeon W-3365
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
96%
#400
EPYC 7713P
MSRP: $5010|Avg: $2443
95%
#401
Xeon W-2145
MSRP: $1113|Avg: $145
94%
#402
EPYC 9475F
MSRP: $7592|Avg: $7592
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Xeon D-2799 leads in gaming performance. However, the Xeon Platinum 8270 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightXeon Platinum 8270Xeon D-2799
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($7,405)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake-SP (2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightXeon Platinum 8270Xeon D-2799
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($7,405)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8270 and Xeon D-2799

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8270

The Xeon Platinum 8270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,602 points. Launch price was $7,405.

Intel

Xeon D-2799

The Xeon D-2799 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 129 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 33,792 points. Launch price was $1,972.

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8270 packs 26 cores / 52 threads, while the Xeon D-2799 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8270 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8270 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon D-2799 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8270 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8270 uses the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-2799 uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8270 scores 33,602 against the Xeon D-2799's 33,792 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon D-2799. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 32,000 vs 20,000 (46.2% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8270). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,200 vs 1,959, a 48.1% lead for the Xeon D-2799 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 1,895 (141.2% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8270). L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8270 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2799.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8270Xeon D-2799
Cores / Threads
26 / 52+30%
20 / 40
Boost Clock
4 GHz+18%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+13%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
35.75 MB (total)+19%
30 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark
33,602
33,792
Cinebench R23 Multi
32,000+60%
20,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,200
1,959+63%
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,000+480%
1,895
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8270 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-2799 uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. Both support up to 1024 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8270) vs 4 (Xeon D-2799). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8270) vs 32 (Xeon D-2799) — the Xeon Platinum 8270 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8270) and Ice Lake-D (Xeon D-2799).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8270Xeon D-2799
Socket
LGA3647
FCBGA2579
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
1024 GB
1024 GB
RAM Channels
6+50%
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
48+50%
32
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8270 targets Server / Workstation, Xeon D-2799 targets Edge Server / Networking. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8270 rivals Xeon Platinum 8268; Xeon D-2799 rivals EPYC 7302.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8270Xeon D-2799
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server / Workstation
Edge Server / Networking