Xeon Platinum 8358
VS
Core Ultra 9 275HX

Xeon Platinum 8358 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8358

32 Cores64 Thrd250 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 9 275HX

24 Cores24 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8358

#452
EPYC 9755
MSRP: $12984|Avg: $10931
108%
#454
Xeon Platinum 8368
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $429
108%
#456
EPYC 9575F
MSRP: $11791|Avg: $9238
106%
#457
EPYC 7642
MSRP: $4775|Avg: $850
105%
#458
EPYC 7573X
MSRP: $5590|Avg: $3580
105%
#459
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
104%
#460
Xeon Gold 6242R
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $779
102%
#460
Xeon E5-2686 V3
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $160
102%
#462
Xeon W-2175
MSRP: $1947|Avg: $180
102%
#463
EPYC 75F3
MSRP: $5383|Avg: $2799
101%
#464
Xeon W-3375
MSRP: $4951|Avg: $6000
101%
#466
Xeon Platinum 8358
MSRP: $4607|Avg: $3145
100%
#467
EPYC 7713
MSRP: $7060|Avg: $1299
100%
#467
EPYC 7662
MSRP: $6150|Avg: $1266
100%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
97%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
97%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
97%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
96%
#473
EPYC 7F32
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $179
94%
#474
EPYC 9654P
MSRP: $10625|Avg: $5345
93%
#475
EPYC 9965
MSRP: $14813|Avg: $10000
92%
#476
EPYC 9745
MSRP: $12141|Avg: $10588
91%
#477
EPYC 7J13
MSRP: $7890|Avg: $150
91%
#478
EPYC 7702
MSRP: $6450|Avg: $2035
91%
#479
EPYC 7763
MSRP: $7890|Avg: $1513
91%
#480
EPYC 9734
MSRP: $9600|Avg: $6598
90%
#481
Xeon Platinum 8160M
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $350
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 275HX

#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
117%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
107%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
102%
#43
Core Ultra 9 275HX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
96%
#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($3,145) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon Platinum 8358 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon Platinum 8358Core Ultra 9 275HX
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($3,145)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-HX (2025) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 9 275HX ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($3,145 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon Platinum 8358Core Ultra 9 275HX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($3,145)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8358 and Core Ultra 9 275HX

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8358

The Xeon Platinum 8358 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 54,416 points. Launch price was $3,950.

Intel

Core Ultra 9 275HX

The Core Ultra 9 275HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 56,018 points. Launch price was $600.

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8358 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 275HX offers 24 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8358 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8358 versus 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 275HX — a 45.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 275HX (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8358 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 275HX uses Arrow Lake-HX (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8358 scores 54,416 against the Core Ultra 9 275HX's 56,018 — a 2.9% lead for the Core Ultra 9 275HX. L3 cache: 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8358 vs 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 275HX.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8358Core Ultra 9 275HX
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+33%
24 / 24
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
5.4 GHz+59%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
2.7 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
48 MB (total)+33%
36 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)+200%
Process
10 nm
3 nm-70%
Architecture
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Arrow Lake-HX (2025)
PassMark
54,416
56,018+3%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,835
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,908
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8358 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 9 275HX uses FCBGA2114 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8358 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 275HX — the Xeon Platinum 8358 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8358 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Platinum 8358) vs 2 (Core Ultra 9 275HX). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8358) vs 24 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) — the Xeon Platinum 8358 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8358) and HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 9 275HX).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8358Core Ultra 9 275HX
Socket
LGA4189
FCBGA2114
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
3200+63900%
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
4096
256 GB+6553500%
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
64+167%
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 9 275HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8358 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 9 275HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 275HX targets High-End Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8358 rivals EPYC 7543; Core Ultra 9 275HX rivals Ryzen 9 9955HX.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8358Core Ultra 9 275HX
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Intel Arc Graphics
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High-End Gaming Laptop