Xeon Platinum 8358
VS
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Xeon Platinum 8358 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8358

32 Cores64 Thrd250 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

24 Cores48 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8358

#452
EPYC 9755
MSRP: $12984|Avg: $10931
108%
#454
Xeon Platinum 8368
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $429
108%
#456
EPYC 9575F
MSRP: $11791|Avg: $9238
106%
#457
EPYC 7642
MSRP: $4775|Avg: $850
105%
#458
EPYC 7573X
MSRP: $5590|Avg: $3580
105%
#459
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
104%
#460
Xeon Gold 6242R
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $779
102%
#460
Xeon E5-2686 V3
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $160
102%
#462
Xeon W-2175
MSRP: $1947|Avg: $180
102%
#463
EPYC 75F3
MSRP: $5383|Avg: $2799
101%
#464
Xeon W-3375
MSRP: $4951|Avg: $6000
101%
#466
Xeon Platinum 8358
MSRP: $4607|Avg: $3145
100%
#467
EPYC 7713
MSRP: $7060|Avg: $1299
100%
#467
EPYC 7662
MSRP: $6150|Avg: $1266
100%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
97%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
97%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
97%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
96%
#473
EPYC 7F32
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $179
94%
#474
EPYC 9654P
MSRP: $10625|Avg: $5345
93%
#475
EPYC 9965
MSRP: $14813|Avg: $10000
92%
#476
EPYC 9745
MSRP: $12141|Avg: $10588
91%
#477
EPYC 7J13
MSRP: $7890|Avg: $150
91%
#478
EPYC 7702
MSRP: $6450|Avg: $2035
91%
#479
EPYC 7763
MSRP: $7890|Avg: $1513
91%
#480
EPYC 9734
MSRP: $9600|Avg: $6598
90%
#481
Xeon Platinum 8160M
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $350
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
484%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
457%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
332%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
100%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
79%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
69%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
40%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
39%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
36%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
36%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
35%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
34%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
34%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
34%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
33%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
33%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
32%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
32%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
31%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Xeon Platinum 8358 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightXeon Platinum 8358Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($3,145)
More affordable ($85)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 97% cheaper ($85 vs $3,145) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightXeon Platinum 8358Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+3624%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($3,145)
More affordable ($85)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8358 and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8358

The Xeon Platinum 8358 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 54,416 points. Launch price was $3,950.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 54,763 points. Launch price was $1,399.

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8358 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8358 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8358 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — a 27.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8358 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8358 scores 54,416 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X's 54,763 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. L3 cache: 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8358 vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8358Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+33%
24 / 48
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
4.5 GHz+32%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
3.8 GHz+46%
L3 Cache
48 MB (total)
128 MB+167%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512K (per core)
Process
10 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-30%
Architecture
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
54,416
54,763
Cinebench R23 Multi
34,260
Geekbench 6 Single
1,270
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8358 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8358 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — the Xeon Platinum 8358 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8358 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 256 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Platinum 8358) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8358) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8358) and AMD TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8358Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Socket
LGA4189
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200+79900%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096
256 GB+6553500%
RAM Channels
8+100%
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
64
88+38%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8358 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8358) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X). Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8358 rivals EPYC 7543; Ryzen Threadripper 3960X rivals Core i9-10900X.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8358Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon Platinum 8358 launched at $4607 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X debuted at $1399. At current prices ($3145 vs $85), the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is $3060 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8358 delivers 17.3 pts/$ vs 644.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X the 189.5% better value option.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8358Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP
$4607
$1399-70%
Avg Price (30d)
$3145
$85-97%
Performance per Dollar
17.3
644.3+3624%
Release Date
2021
2019