
Xeon Platinum 8362

Xeon W-3365
Xeon Platinum 8362 vs Xeon W-3365 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Platinum 8362 vs Xeon W-3365 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Platinum 8362 vs Xeon W-3365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Platinum 8362
2021Why buy it
- β Draws 265W instead of 270W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3365 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (56,787 vs 57,312).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($6,236 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
Xeon W-3365
2021Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $2,737 less on MSRP ($3,499 MSRP vs $6,236 MSRP).
- β Delivers 79.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $6,236 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-3365 better than Xeon Platinum 8362?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Platinum 8362 vs Xeon W-3365 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Platinum 8362
The Xeon Platinum 8362 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 265 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 56,787 points. Launch price was $3,500.

Xeon W-3365
The Xeon W-3365 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,312 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon Platinum 8362 and Xeon W-3365 share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8362 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3365 β a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3365 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8362 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon W-3365 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8362 scores 56,787 against the Xeon W-3365's 57,312 β a 0.9% lead for the Xeon W-3365. Both processors carry 48 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8362 | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+4% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 48 MB (total) | 48 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 56,787 | 57,312 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 16,817 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA4189 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 64 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8362) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3365).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8362 | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8362) vs true (Xeon W-3365). Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8362 rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon W-3365 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8362 | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8362 was priced at $6236, while the Xeon W-3365 came in at $3499. On launch pricing ($6236 vs $3499), Xeon W-3365 was $2737 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8362 delivers 9.1 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3365 β making the Xeon W-3365 the 57.1% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8362 | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6236 | $3499-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | 16.4+80% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















