Xeon Platinum 8362 vs Xeon W-3365

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8362

32 Cores64 Thrd265 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Xeon W-3365

32 Cores64 Thrd270 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

Xeon Platinum 8362 vs Xeon W-3365 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Platinum 8362 vs Xeon W-3365 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Platinum 8362 vs Xeon W-3365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Platinum 8362

2021

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 265W instead of 270W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3365 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (56,787 vs 57,312).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($6,236 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).

Xeon W-3365

2021

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Costs $2,737 less on MSRP ($3,499 MSRP vs $6,236 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 79.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $6,236 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3365 better than Xeon Platinum 8362?
Yes. Xeon W-3365 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3365 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3365 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-3365 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3365 comes in $2,737 cheaper on MSRP at $3,499 MSRP versus $6,236 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 79.9% better value on MSRP (16.4 vs 9.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-3365 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 32/64. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Platinum 8362 vs Xeon W-3365 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8362

The Xeon Platinum 8362 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 265 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 56,787 points. Launch price was $3,500.

Intel

Xeon W-3365

The Xeon W-3365 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,312 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚑

Processing Power

Both the Xeon Platinum 8362 and Xeon W-3365 share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8362 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3365 β€” a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3365 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8362 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon W-3365 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8362 scores 56,787 against the Xeon W-3365's 57,312 β€” a 0.9% lead for the Xeon W-3365. Both processors carry 48 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8362Xeon W-3365
Cores / Threads
32 / 64
32 / 64
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+4%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
48 MB (total)
48 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
10 nm
Architecture
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark
56,787
57,312
Geekbench 6 Single
β€”
1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi
β€”
16,817
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA4189 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 64 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8362) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3365).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8362Xeon W-3365
Socket
LGA4189
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
3200
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB
4096 GB
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
64
64
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8362) vs true (Xeon W-3365). Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8362 rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon W-3365 rivals EPYC 7543.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8362Xeon W-3365
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8362 was priced at $6236, while the Xeon W-3365 came in at $3499. On launch pricing ($6236 vs $3499), Xeon W-3365 was $2737 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8362 delivers 9.1 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3365 β€” making the Xeon W-3365 the 57.1% better value option.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8362Xeon W-3365
MSRP
$6236
$3499-44%
Performance per Dollar
9.1
16.4+80%
Release Date
2021
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.