Xeon Platinum 8362 vs Xeon w7-3455

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8362

32 Cores64 Thrd265 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Xeon w7-3455

24 Cores48 Thrd270 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Xeon Platinum 8362 vs Xeon w7-3455 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Platinum 8362 vs Xeon w7-3455 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Platinum 8362 vs Xeon w7-3455: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Platinum 8362

2021

Why buy it

  • βœ…+3.4% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…Draws 265W instead of 270W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3455 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (48 MB vs 68 MB).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($6,236 MSRP vs $2,489 MSRP).
  • ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3455 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w7-3455

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+40.6% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 48 MB).
  • βœ…Costs $3,747 less on MSRP ($2,489 MSRP vs $6,236 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 142.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.1 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($2,489 MSRP vs $6,236 MSRP).
  • βœ…Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (54,925 vs 56,787).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3455 better than Xeon Platinum 8362?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w7-3455 is ahead with a 13.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8362 pulls ahead with 3.4% better PassMark. Xeon w7-3455 also has the bigger cache pool with 40.6% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 48 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8362 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.4% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon w7-3455 is the better buy right now. Xeon w7-3455 comes in $3,747 cheaper on MSRP at $2,489 MSRP versus $6,236 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8362 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3.4% better PassMark. It is also 142.3% better value on MSRP (22.1 vs 9.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon w7-3455 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 40.6% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 48 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon Platinum 8362 vs Xeon w7-3455 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8362

The Xeon Platinum 8362 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 265 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 56,787 points. Launch price was $3,500.

Intel

Xeon w7-3455

The Xeon w7-3455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023βˆ’2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 54,925 points. Launch price was $2,489.

⚑

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8362 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w7-3455 offers 24 cores / 48 threads β€” the Xeon Platinum 8362 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8362 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3455 β€” a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3455 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8362 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon w7-3455 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023βˆ’2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8362 scores 56,787 against the Xeon w7-3455's 54,925 β€” a 3.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8362. L3 cache: 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8362 vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3455.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8362Xeon w7-3455
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+33%
24 / 48
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4.8 GHz+33%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+12%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
48 MB (total)
67.5 MB+41%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
10 nm
Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Sapphire Rapids (2023βˆ’2024)
PassMark
56,787+3%
54,925
Geekbench 6 Single
β€”
1,900
Geekbench 6 Multi
β€”
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8362 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3455 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8362 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3455 β€” the Xeon w7-3455 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8362) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3455) β€” the Xeon w7-3455 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8362) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3455).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8362Xeon w7-3455
Socket
LGA4189
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
3200
DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB
4096 GB
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
64
112+75%
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3455 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β€” a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8362) vs true (Xeon w7-3455). Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8362 rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon w7-3455 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8362Xeon w7-3455
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8362 was priced at $6236, while the Xeon w7-3455 came in at $2489. On launch pricing ($6236 vs $2489), Xeon w7-3455 was $3747 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8362 delivers 9.1 pts/$ vs 22.1 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3455 β€” making the Xeon w7-3455 the 83.2% better value option.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8362Xeon w7-3455
MSRP
$6236
$2489-60%
Performance per Dollar
9.1
22.1+143%
Release Date
2021
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.