Xeon Platinum 8481C
VS
Xeon E5-2648L v4

Xeon Platinum 8481C vs Xeon E5-2648L v4

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8481C

56 Cores112 Thrd350 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2648L v4

14 Cores28 Thrd75 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon Platinum 8481C is positioned at rank 296 and the Xeon E5-2648L v4 is on rank 439, so the Xeon Platinum 8481C offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8481C

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4448%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
840%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
746%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
576%
#230
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $368
100%
#232
EPYC 7282
MSRP: $650|Avg: $199
99%
#233
Xeon w5-2545
MSRP: $889|Avg: $1100
98%
#234
Xeon W-1250P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
98%
#296
Xeon Platinum 8481C
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#304
Xeon E5-2620 v4
MSRP: $417|Avg: $410
99%
#306
Xeon Silver 4108
MSRP: $417|Avg: $46
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2648L v4

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6582%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6219%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4516%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1360%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1078%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
943%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
540%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
533%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
485%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
485%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
480%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
467%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
460%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
458%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
454%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
99%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
99%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
99%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
98%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
98%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
95%
#439
Xeon E5-2648L v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#444
Pentium G4560T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $20
99%
#449
Ryzen 5 1400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $91
97%
#450
Celeron G1850
MSRP: $42|Avg: $30
96%
#451
Celeron G3900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $70
96%
#453
Phenom X4 9100e
MSRP: $200|Avg: $35
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Xeon Platinum 8481C (2023) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon Platinum 8481CXeon E5-2648L v4
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2648L v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon Platinum 8481CXeon E5-2648L v4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8481C and Xeon E5-2648L v4

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8481C

The Xeon Platinum 8481C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,681 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon E5-2648L v4

The Xeon E5-2648L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 11,839 points. Launch price was $1,544.

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8481C packs 56 cores / 112 threads, while the Xeon E5-2648L v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8481C has 42 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8481C versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2648L v4 — a 71.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8481C. The Xeon Platinum 8481C uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2648L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8481C scores 11,681 against the Xeon E5-2648L v4's 11,839 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2648L v4. L3 cache: 105 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8481C vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2648L v4.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8481CXeon E5-2648L v4
Cores / Threads
56 / 112+300%
14 / 28
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+111%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
105 MB+200%
35 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
3.5 MB+75%
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
11,681
11,839+1%