Xeon Silver 4109T
VS
Core i5-9600

Xeon Silver 4109T vs Core i5-9600

Intel

Xeon Silver 4109T

8 Cores16 Thrd70 WWMax: 3 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i5-9600

6 Cores6 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon Silver 4109T is positioned at rank #350 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Silver 4109T

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5021%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
948%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
842%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
651%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
99%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
99%
#350
Xeon Silver 4109T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#362
Xeon E5-2667 v2
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-9600

#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
112%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
112%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
111%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
110%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
110%
#339
Core i5-8500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $149
110%
#340
Core i9-9900KF
MSRP: $488|Avg: $350
109%
#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
109%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
108%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
106%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
105%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
104%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
104%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
100%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
100%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
100%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
99%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
98%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
98%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
96%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
96%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
96%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
95%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
95%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
95%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
94%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
94%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
93%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
93%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon Silver 4109T is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon Silver 4109TCore i5-9600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($219)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-9600 ($219), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($219 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon Silver 4109TCore i5-9600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($219)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Silver 4109T and Core i5-9600

Intel

Xeon Silver 4109T

The Xeon Silver 4109T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,348 points. Launch price was $501.

Intel

Core i5-9600

The Core i5-9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,313 points. Launch price was $213.

Processing Power

The Xeon Silver 4109T packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-9600 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon Silver 4109T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4109T versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-9600 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-9600 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon Silver 4109T uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-9600 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Silver 4109T scores 10,348 against the Core i5-9600's 10,313 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Silver 4109T. L3 cache: 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4109T vs 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9600.

FeatureXeon Silver 4109TCore i5-9600
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+33%
6 / 6
Boost Clock
3 GHz
4.6 GHz+53%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.1 GHz+55%
L3 Cache
11 MB+22%
9 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8 MB+3100%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
10,348
10,313
Geekbench 6 Single
1,443
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Silver 4109T uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-9600 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon Silver 4109TCore i5-9600
Socket
LGA3647
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Silver 4109T) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-9600). The Core i5-9600 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon Silver 4109T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-9600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-9600 rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureXeon Silver 4109TCore i5-9600
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Desktop