Xeon Silver 4109T
VS
Core i7-9750HF

Xeon Silver 4109T vs Core i7-9750HF

Intel

Xeon Silver 4109T

8 Cores16 Thrd70 WWMax: 3 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i7-9750HF

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon Silver 4109T is positioned at rank 350 and the Core i7-9750HF is on rank 772, so the Xeon Silver 4109T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Silver 4109T

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5021%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
948%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
842%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
651%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
99%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
99%
#350
Xeon Silver 4109T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#362
Xeon E5-2667 v2
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9750HF

#759
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1115%
#760
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1099%
#761
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1009%
#762
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1004%
#763
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
995%
#765
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
961%
#766
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
921%
#767
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
920%
#768
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
895%
#772
Core i7-9750HF
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon Silver 4109T is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon Silver 4109TCore i7-9750HF
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($395)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-HR (2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-9750HF ($395), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($395 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon Silver 4109TCore i7-9750HF
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($395)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Silver 4109T and Core i7-9750HF

Intel

Xeon Silver 4109T

The Xeon Silver 4109T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,348 points. Launch price was $501.

Intel

Core i7-9750HF

The Core i7-9750HF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 10,393 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon Silver 4109T packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-9750HF offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon Silver 4109T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4109T versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-9750HF — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i7-9750HF (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon Silver 4109T uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-9750HF uses Coffee Lake-HR (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Silver 4109T scores 10,348 against the Core i7-9750HF's 10,393 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-9750HF. L3 cache: 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4109T vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9750HF.

FeatureXeon Silver 4109TCore i7-9750HF
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3 GHz
4.5 GHz+50%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
11 MB
12 MB (total)+9%
L2 Cache
8 MB+3100%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Coffee Lake-HR (2019)
PassMark
10,348
10,393
Cinebench R23 Multi
6,915
Geekbench 6 Single
1,120
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,149
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Silver 4109T uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-9750HF uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon Silver 4109TCore i7-9750HF
Socket
LGA3647
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Silver 4109T) / Yes (Core i7-9750HF).

FeatureXeon Silver 4109TCore i7-9750HF
Integrated GPU
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes