Xeon Silver 4109T vs Xeon Silver 4110

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Silver 4109T vs Xeon Silver 4110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Silver 4109T vs Xeon Silver 4110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Silver 4109T

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 70W instead of 85W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4110 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Silver 4110

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,314 vs 10,348).
❌21.4% higher power demand at 85W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4109T better than Xeon Silver 4110?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Silver 4110 is ahead with a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4109T pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4109T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4109T still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Silver 4109T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4110 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon Silver 4109T vs Xeon Silver 4110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Silver 4109T

The Xeon Silver 4109T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,348 points. Launch price was $501.

Xeon Silver 4110

The Xeon Silver 4110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,314 points. Launch price was $501.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon Silver 4110 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4109T versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4110 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Silver 4109T scores 10,348 against the Xeon Silver 4110's 10,314 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Silver 4109T. Both processors carry 11 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Xeon Silver 4109T	Xeon Silver 4110
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.1 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	11 MB	11 MB
L2 Cache	8 MB	8 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	10,348	10,314