Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Xeon Silver 4109T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Xeon Silver 4109T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Xeon Silver 4109T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2660 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+127.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 11 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,393 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4109T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌35.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 70W.

Xeon Silver 4109T

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 95W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2660 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (10,348 vs 10,353).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 25 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2660 v2 better than Xeon Silver 4109T?

Yes. Xeon E5-2660 v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2660 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2660 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 127.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 11 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2660 v2 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2660 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,393 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4109T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Xeon Silver 4109T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2660 v2

The Xeon E5-2660 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,353 points. Launch price was $850.

Xeon Silver 4109T

The Xeon Silver 4109T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,348 points. Launch price was $501.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2660 v2 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4109T offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2660 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 v2 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4109T — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2660 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4109T uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2660 v2 scores 10,353 against the Xeon Silver 4109T's 10,348 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-2660 v2. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4109T.

Feature	Xeon E5-2660 v2	Xeon Silver 4109T
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	25 MB (total)+127%	11 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	8 MB+3100%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	10,353	10,348

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2660 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4109T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.