
Core i7-9750HF vs Xeon E5-2660 v2

Core i7-9750HF

Xeon E5-2660 v2
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-9750HF is positioned at rank 772 and the Xeon E5-2660 v2 is on rank 931, so the Core i7-9750HF offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9750HF
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2660 v2
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-9750HF | Xeon E5-2660 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($395) | ✅ More affordable ($129) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-HR (2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-9750HF | Xeon E5-2660 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+205%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($395) | ✅ More affordable ($129) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9750HF and Xeon E5-2660 v2

Core i7-9750HF
The Core i7-9750HF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 10,393 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2660 v2
The Xeon E5-2660 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,353 points. Launch price was $850.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9750HF packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2660 v2 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2660 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-9750HF versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 v2 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i7-9750HF (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-9750HF uses the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2660 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9750HF scores 10,393 against the Xeon E5-2660 v2's 10,353 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-9750HF. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9750HF vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2660 v2.
| Feature | Core i7-9750HF | Xeon E5-2660 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+50% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+18% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+108% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-HR (2019) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 10,393 | 10,353 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 6,915 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,120 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,149 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9750HF uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2660 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9750HF versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2660 v2 — the Core i7-9750HF supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2660 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9750HF) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2660 v2). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9750HF) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2660 v2) — the Xeon E5-2660 v2 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM370,QM370,CM246 (Core i7-9750HF) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2660 v2).
| Feature | Core i7-9750HF | Xeon E5-2660 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+33% | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-9750HF) / not specified (Xeon E5-2660 v2).
| Feature | Core i7-9750HF | Xeon E5-2660 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9750HF launched at $395 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2660 v2 debuted at $1393. At current prices ($395 vs $129), the Xeon E5-2660 v2 is $266 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9750HF delivers 26.3 pts/$ vs 80.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2660 v2 — making the Xeon E5-2660 v2 the 101.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9750HF | Xeon E5-2660 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $395-72% | $1393 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $395 | $129-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.3 | 80.3+205% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














