Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Xeon W-2225

Intel

Xeon E5-2660 v2

10 Cores20 Thrd95 WWMax: 3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon W-2225

4 Cores8 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Xeon W-2225 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Xeon W-2225 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Xeon W-2225: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2660 v2

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +203% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8.3 MB).
  • Draws 95W instead of 105W, a 10W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (10,353 vs 10,425).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($1,393 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).

Xeon W-2225

2019

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $227 less on MSRP ($1,166 MSRP vs $1,393 MSRP).
  • Delivers 20.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.9 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($1,166 MSRP vs $1,393 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2660 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 25 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2225 better than Xeon E5-2660 v2?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2660 v2 is ahead with a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2225 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2660 v2 also has the bigger cache pool with 203% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8.3 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2225 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-2225 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2225 comes in $227 cheaper on MSRP at $1,166 MSRP versus $1,393 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2660 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 20.3% better value on MSRP (8.9 vs 7.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-2225 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs Xeon W-2225 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E5-2660 v2

The Xeon E5-2660 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,353 points. Launch price was $850.

Intel

Xeon W-2225

The Xeon W-2225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 10,425 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2660 v2 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-2225 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2660 v2 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 v2 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-2225 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2225 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2660 v2 is built on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2660 v2 scores 10,353 against the Xeon W-2225's 10,425 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-2225. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2660 v2 vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon W-2225.

FeatureXeon E5-2660 v2Xeon W-2225
Cores / Threads
10 / 20+150%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3 GHz
4.6 GHz+53%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
4.1 GHz+86%
L3 Cache
25 MB (total)+203%
8.25 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark
10,353
10,425
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2660 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2225 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2660 v2Xeon W-2225
Socket
LGA2011
LGA2066
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
40
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2660 v2 was priced at $1393, while the Xeon W-2225 came in at $1166. On launch pricing ($1393 vs $1166), Xeon W-2225 was $227 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2660 v2 delivers 7.4 pts/$ vs 8.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2225 — making the Xeon W-2225 the 18.4% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-2660 v2Xeon W-2225
MSRP
$1393
$1166-16%
Performance per Dollar
7.4
8.9+20%
Release Date
2013
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.