Xeon Silver 4514Y vs Xeon W-3245

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Silver 4514Y vs Xeon W-3245 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Silver 4514Y vs Xeon W-3245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Silver 4514Y

2023

Why buy it

✅+22.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 205W, a 55W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon W-3245

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 22,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,199 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4514Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌36.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 150W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4514Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4514Y better than Xeon W-3245?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-3245 is ahead with a 28.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4514Y pulls ahead with 22.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Xeon Silver 4514Y also has the bigger cache pool with 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4514Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 22.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4514Y is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-3245 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Silver 4514Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,199 MSRP, and it still gives you 22.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The compromise is that Xeon W-3245 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 28.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-3245 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4514Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon Silver 4514Y vs Xeon W-3245 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Silver 4514Y

The Xeon Silver 4514Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,621 points. Launch price was $780.

Xeon W-3245

The Xeon W-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 31,089 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon Silver 4514Y and Xeon W-3245 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4514Y versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245 — a 30% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3245 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon Silver 4514Y uses the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3245 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Silver 4514Y scores 30,621 against the Xeon W-3245's 31,089 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon W-3245. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,000 vs 18,000 (20% advantage for the Xeon Silver 4514Y). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,100 vs 1,353, a 43.3% lead for the Xeon Silver 4514Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 11,698 (17.9% advantage for the Xeon Silver 4514Y). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4514Y vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245.

Feature	Xeon Silver 4514Y	Xeon W-3245
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	4.6 GHz+35%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.2 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+36%	22 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	16 MB+700%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Emerald Rapids (2023)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	30,621	31,089+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	22,000+22%	18,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,100+55%	1,353
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,000+20%	11,698

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Silver 4514Y uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3245 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4400 on the Xeon Silver 4514Y versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245 — the Xeon Silver 4514Y supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4514Y supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Silver 4514Y) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245). PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Silver 4514Y) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245) — the Xeon Silver 4514Y offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon Silver 4514Y) and C621 (Xeon W-3245).

Feature	Xeon Silver 4514Y	Xeon W-3245
Socket	LGA4677	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4400+50%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+300%	1024 GB
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	80+25%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Silver 4514Y targets Mainstream Server / Virtualization, Xeon W-3245 targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4514Y rivals EPYC 8212; Xeon W-3245 rivals Threadripper 2950X.

Feature	Xeon Silver 4514Y	Xeon W-3245
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Mainstream Server / Virtualization	Professional Workstation