EPYC 9015 vs Xeon Silver 4514Y

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon Silver 4514Y Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9015

8 / 16

30,505

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Xeon Silver 4514Y

16 / 32

30,621

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon Silver 4514Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon Silver 4514Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9015

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,000 vs 22,000).

Xeon Silver 4514Y

2023

Why buy it

✅+46.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9015 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9015 better than Xeon Silver 4514Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9015 is ahead with a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4514Y pulls ahead with 46.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. EPYC 9015 also has the bigger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4514Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 46.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9015 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 9015 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9015 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and 113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon Silver 4514Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9015

The EPYC 9015 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,505 points. Launch price was $527.

Xeon Silver 4514Y

The Xeon Silver 4514Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,621 points. Launch price was $780.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9015 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4514Y offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Silver 4514Y has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9015 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4514Y — a 18.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9015 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9015 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4514Y uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9015 scores 30,505 against the Xeon Silver 4514Y's 30,621 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Silver 4514Y. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,000 vs 22,000 (37.8% advantage for the Xeon Silver 4514Y). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,400 vs 2,100, a 40% lead for the Xeon Silver 4514Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 14,000 (24% advantage for the Xeon Silver 4514Y). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9015 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4514Y.

Feature	EPYC 9015	Xeon Silver 4514Y
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+21%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+80%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+113%	30 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	30,505	30,621
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,000	22,000+47%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	2,100+50%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,000	14,000+27%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9015 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Silver 4514Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9015 versus DDR5-4400 on the Xeon Silver 4514Y — the EPYC 9015 supports 36.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9015) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4514Y). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9015) vs 80 (Xeon Silver 4514Y) — the EPYC 9015 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 platform (EPYC 9015) and C741 (Xeon Silver 4514Y).

Feature	EPYC 9015	Xeon Silver 4514Y
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+36%	DDR5-4400
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	4096 GB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9015) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4514Y). Primary use case: EPYC 9015 targets Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads, Xeon Silver 4514Y targets Mainstream Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9015 rivals Xeon 6; Xeon Silver 4514Y rivals EPYC 8212.

Feature	EPYC 9015	Xeon Silver 4514Y
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads	Mainstream Server / Virtualization