EPYC 9015 vs Xeon Platinum 8260

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9015

8 Cores16 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8260

24 Cores48 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon Platinum 8260 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9015

8 / 16

30,505

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Xeon Platinum 8260

24 / 48

30,720

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon Platinum 8260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon Platinum 8260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9015

2024

Why buy it

✅+17.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Draws 125W instead of 165W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,000 vs 18,500).

Xeon Platinum 8260

2019

Why buy it

✅+23.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,190 vs 1,400).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while EPYC 9015 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌32% higher power demand at 165W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while EPYC 9015 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9015 better than Xeon Platinum 8260?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 9015 is ahead with a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8260 pulls ahead with 23.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. EPYC 9015 also has the bigger cache pool with 79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8260 is the stronger fit. You are getting 23.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9015 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Platinum 8260 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9015 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $400 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8260 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 23.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Xeon Platinum 8260 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (76.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9015 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and 79% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon Platinum 8260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9015

The EPYC 9015 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,505 points. Launch price was $527.

Xeon Platinum 8260

The Xeon Platinum 8260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,720 points. Launch price was $4,702.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9015 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8260 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9015 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260 — a 5% clock advantage for the EPYC 9015 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9015 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8260 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9015 scores 30,505 against the Xeon Platinum 8260's 30,720 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8260. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,000 vs 18,500 (20.9% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,400 vs 1,190, a 16.2% lead for the EPYC 9015 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 6,946 (45.2% advantage for the EPYC 9015). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9015 vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8260.

Feature	EPYC 9015	Xeon Platinum 8260
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	24 / 48+200%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+5%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+50%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+79%	35.75 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
PassMark	30,505	30,720
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,000	18,500+23%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400+18%	1,190
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,000+58%	6,946

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9015 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8260 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9015 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8260 — the EPYC 9015 supports 104.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9015 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9015) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8260). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9015) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8260) — the EPYC 9015 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 platform (EPYC 9015) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8260).

Feature	EPYC 9015	Xeon Platinum 8260
Socket	SP5	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+105%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+300%	1024 GB
RAM Channels	12+100%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+167%	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9015) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8260). Primary use case: EPYC 9015 targets Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads, Xeon Platinum 8260 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9015 rivals Xeon 6; Xeon Platinum 8260 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R.

Feature	EPYC 9015	Xeon Platinum 8260
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads	Server / Workstation