EPYC 9015 vs Xeon W-2295

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon W-2295 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9015

8 / 16

30,505

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Xeon W-2295

18 / 36

30,986

+1.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon W-2295 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon W-2295: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9015

2024

Why buy it

✅+158.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 125W instead of 165W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2295 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,000 vs 12,863).

Xeon W-2295

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,333 MSRP, while EPYC 9015 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌32% higher power demand at 165W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while EPYC 9015 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2295 better than EPYC 9015?

Yes. Xeon W-2295 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 16.9% better Geekbench multi-core, and 1.6% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2295 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2295 is the stronger fit. You are getting 16.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2295 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2295 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,333 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9015 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, and 158.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon W-2295 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9015

The EPYC 9015 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,505 points. Launch price was $527.

Xeon W-2295

The Xeon W-2295 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,986 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9015 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2295 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2295 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9015 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2295 — a 15.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2295 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 9015 is built on the Turin (2024) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 9015 scores 30,505 against the Xeon W-2295's 30,986 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon W-2295. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,400 vs 1,703, a 19.5% lead for the Xeon W-2295 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 12,863 (15.6% advantage for the Xeon W-2295). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9015 vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon W-2295.

Feature	EPYC 9015	Xeon W-2295
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	4.8 GHz+17%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+20%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+159%	24.75 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	—
PassMark	30,505	30,986+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	1,703+22%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,000	12,863+17%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9015 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2295 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9015 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-2295 — the EPYC 9015 supports 104.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9015 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9015) vs 4 (Xeon W-2295). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9015) vs 48 (Xeon W-2295) — the EPYC 9015 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 platform (EPYC 9015) and C422 (Xeon W-2295).

Feature	EPYC 9015	Xeon W-2295
Socket	SP5	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+105%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+300%	1024 GB
RAM Channels	12+200%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+167%	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9015) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2295). Primary use case: EPYC 9015 targets Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads, Xeon W-2295 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9015 rivals Xeon 6.

Feature	EPYC 9015	Xeon W-2295
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads	Workstation