EPYC 9015
VS
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

EPYC 9015 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

AMD

EPYC 9015

8 Cores16 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2024
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

24 Cores48 Thrd250 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9015

#232
EPYC 7282
MSRP: $650|Avg: $199
107%
#233
Xeon w5-2545
MSRP: $889|Avg: $1100
105%
#234
Xeon W-1250P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
105%
#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
104%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
103%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
103%
#241
Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1145
102%
#242
Xeon E-2246G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $268
102%
#244
Xeon w3-2423
MSRP: $359|Avg: $300
101%
#245
EPYC 8434P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $3137
101%
#246
EPYC 9015
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
97%
#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
97%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
97%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
97%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
97%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
94%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
94%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
93%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
92%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
91%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
149%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
145%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
145%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
139%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
137%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
136%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
127%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
119%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
118%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
117%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
116%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
113%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
111%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
110%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
108%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
100%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
93%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
86%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
83%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
59%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
32%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The EPYC 9015 (2024) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightEPYC 9015Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,300)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen+ (2018−2019) / 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (2018) relies on 12 nm technology and **DDR4 Quad-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightEPYC 9015Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,300)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9015 and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

AMD

EPYC 9015

The EPYC 9015 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,505 points. Launch price was $527.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,954 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9015 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9015 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 9015 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9015 scores 30,505 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX's 30,954 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,000 vs 29,045 (63.8% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,400 vs 1,240, a 12.1% lead for the EPYC 9015 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 7,241 (41.2% advantage for the EPYC 9015). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9015 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.

FeatureEPYC 9015Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
24 / 48+200%
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz
4.2 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+20%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
64 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512K (per core)
Process
4 nm-67%
12 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark
30,505
30,954+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
15,000
29,045+94%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,400+13%
1,240
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,000+52%
7,241
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9015 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9015 versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — the EPYC 9015 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9015 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9015) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9015) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX) — the EPYC 9015 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 platform (EPYC 9015) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX).

FeatureEPYC 9015Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Socket
SP5
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6000+25%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+100%
2048 GB
RAM Channels
12+200%
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+100%
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9015 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9015) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9015 targets Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads, Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX targets Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9015 rivals Xeon 6; Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX rivals Core i9-7940X.

FeatureEPYC 9015Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
AMD-V
Target Use
Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads
Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation