EPYC 9015 vs Xeon 6357P

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon 6357P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9015

8 / 16

30,505

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Xeon 6357P

8 / 16

30,401

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon 6357P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon 6357P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9015

2024

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,400 vs 2,784).
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,000 vs 18,000).
❌56.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 80W.

Xeon 6357P

2025

Why buy it

✅+98.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 80W instead of 125W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6357P better than EPYC 9015?

Yes. Xeon 6357P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 20% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6357P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6357P is the stronger fit. You are getting 20% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6357P still makes the most sense overall. Xeon 6357P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6357P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 9015 vs Xeon 6357P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9015

The EPYC 9015 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,505 points. Launch price was $527.

Xeon 6357P

The Xeon 6357P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 30,401 points. Launch price was $556.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9015 and Xeon 6357P share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9015 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6357P — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 6357P (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 9015 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6357P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9015 scores 30,505 against the Xeon 6357P's 30,401 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 9015. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,000 vs 18,000 (18.2% advantage for the Xeon 6357P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,400 vs 2,784, a 66.2% lead for the Xeon 6357P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 12,769 (14.9% advantage for the Xeon 6357P). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9015 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6357P.

Feature	EPYC 9015	Xeon 6357P
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	5.1 GHz+24%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+20%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+167%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	30,505	30,401
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,000	18,000+20%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	2,784+99%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,000	12,769+16%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9015 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6357P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9015 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon 6357P — the EPYC 9015 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9015 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9015) vs 2 (Xeon 6357P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9015) vs 20 (Xeon 6357P) — the EPYC 9015 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 platform (EPYC 9015) and Server chipsets (Xeon 6357P).

Feature	EPYC 9015	Xeon 6357P
Socket	SP5	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000+25%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+3100%	128 GB
RAM Channels	12+500%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+540%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9015) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon 6357P). Primary use case: EPYC 9015 targets Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads, Xeon 6357P targets Edge Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9015 rivals Xeon 6; Xeon 6357P rivals Core i7-14700.

Feature	EPYC 9015	Xeon 6357P
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads	Edge Server / Workstation