Xeon W-1350
VS
Ryzen 5 220

Xeon W-1350 vs Ryzen 5 220

Intel

Xeon W-1350

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 5 GHz2021
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 220

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-1350

#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
104%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
100%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
100%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
100%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 220

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
114%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
107%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
105%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
96%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($255) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W-1350 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W-1350Ryzen 5 220
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($255)
More affordable ($150)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-S (2021) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 5 220 ($150), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($105 less, 41% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W-1350Ryzen 5 220
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+70%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($255)
More affordable ($150)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-1350 and Ryzen 5 220

Intel

Xeon W-1350

The Xeon W-1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,742 points. Launch price was $255.

AMD

Ryzen 5 220

The Ryzen 5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,762 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon W-1350 and Ryzen 5 220 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Xeon W-1350 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 220 — a 2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon W-1350 uses the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 220 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-1350 scores 18,742 against the Ryzen 5 220's 18,762 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 220. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,140 vs 1,300, a 48.8% lead for the Xeon W-1350 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,104 vs 7,700 (16.7% advantage for the Xeon W-1350). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 220.

FeatureXeon W-1350Ryzen 5 220
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
5 GHz+2%
4.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+3%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
4 nm-71%
Architecture
Rocket Lake-S (2021)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
18,742
18,762
Geekbench 6 Single
2,140+65%
1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,104+18%
7,700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-1350 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 220 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-1350 versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 5 220 — the Ryzen 5 220 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-1350 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Xeon W-1350) vs 14 (Ryzen 5 220) — the Xeon W-1350 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W580,C252,C256 (Xeon W-1350) and SoC (Ryzen 5 220).

FeatureXeon W-1350Ryzen 5 220
Socket
LGA1200
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+100%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20+43%
14
🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: Yes (Xeon W-1350) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 220). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics P750 (Xeon W-1350) and Radeon 740M (Ryzen 5 220) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 220 targets Thin and Light Laptop.

FeatureXeon W-1350Ryzen 5 220
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics P750
Radeon 740M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
Yes
AMD-V
Target Use
Thin and Light Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon W-1350 launched at $255 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 220 debuted at $150. At current prices ($255 vs $150), the Ryzen 5 220 is $105 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-1350 delivers 73.5 pts/$ vs 125.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 220 — making the Ryzen 5 220 the 52% better value option.

FeatureXeon W-1350Ryzen 5 220
MSRP
$255
$150-41%
Avg Price (30d)
$255
$150-41%
Performance per Dollar
73.5
125.1+70%
Release Date
2021
2025