Xeon W-1350
VS
Xeon Silver 4309Y

Xeon W-1350 vs Xeon Silver 4309Y

Intel

Xeon W-1350

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 5 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4309Y

8 Cores16 Thrd105 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-1350

#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
104%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
100%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
100%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
100%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Silver 4309Y

#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
103%
#94
Xeon Silver 4309Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
98%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
98%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
98%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Xeon W-1350 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Xeon Silver 4309Y in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightXeon W-1350Xeon Silver 4309Y
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($255)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-S (2021) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightXeon W-1350Xeon Silver 4309Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($255)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-1350 and Xeon Silver 4309Y

Intel

Xeon W-1350

The Xeon W-1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,742 points. Launch price was $255.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4309Y

The Xeon Silver 4309Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 18,718 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon W-1350 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4309Y offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4309Y has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Xeon W-1350 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4309Y — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon W-1350 uses the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4309Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-1350 scores 18,742 against the Xeon Silver 4309Y's 18,718 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon W-1350. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureXeon W-1350Xeon Silver 4309Y
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
5 GHz+39%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+18%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Rocket Lake-S (2021)
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark
18,742
18,718
Geekbench 6 Single
2,140
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,104
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-1350 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4309Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W-1350Xeon Silver 4309Y
Socket
LGA1200
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Xeon W-1350) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4309Y). The Xeon W-1350 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics P750), while the Xeon Silver 4309Y requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureXeon W-1350Xeon Silver 4309Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics P750
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
Yes