Xeon W-1350
VS
Xeon E5-2695 v4

Xeon W-1350 vs Xeon E5-2695 v4

Intel

Xeon W-1350

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 5 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2695 v4

18 Cores36 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-1350

#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
104%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
100%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
100%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
100%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2695 v4

#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
102%
#91
Xeon E5-2695 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
98%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
98%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
97%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Xeon W-1350 (2021) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon W-1350Xeon E5-2695 v4
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($255)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-S (2021) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon W-1350Xeon E5-2695 v4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($255)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-1350 and Xeon E5-2695 v4

Intel

Xeon W-1350

The Xeon W-1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,742 points. Launch price was $255.

Intel

Xeon E5-2695 v4

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,835 points. Launch price was $2,424.

Processing Power

The Xeon W-1350 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Xeon W-1350 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 — a 41% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon W-1350 uses the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-1350 scores 18,742 against the Xeon E5-2695 v4's 18,835 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2695 v4. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350 vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2695 v4.

FeatureXeon W-1350Xeon E5-2695 v4
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
18 / 36+200%
Boost Clock
5 GHz+52%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+57%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
45 MB+275%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
4.5 MB+800%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Rocket Lake-S (2021)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
18,742
18,835
Geekbench 6 Single
2,140
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,104
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-1350 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W-1350Xeon E5-2695 v4
Socket
LGA1200
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Xeon W-1350) / not specified (Xeon E5-2695 v4). The Xeon W-1350 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics P750), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureXeon W-1350Xeon E5-2695 v4
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics P750
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
Yes