Xeon W-1370
VS
EPYC 7351

Xeon W-1370 vs EPYC 7351

Intel

Xeon W-1370

8 Cores16 Thrd80 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2021
VS
AMD

EPYC 7351

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-1370

#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
102%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
100%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
98%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7351

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
537%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
4%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
10%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
9%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
9%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
8%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
101%
#8
EPYC 7351
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
90%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
70%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
69%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
63%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Xeon W-1370 leads in gaming performance. However, the EPYC 7351 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightXeon W-1370EPYC 7351
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($323)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-S (2021) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightXeon W-1370EPYC 7351
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($323)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-1370 and EPYC 7351

Intel

Xeon W-1370

The Xeon W-1370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,948 points. Launch price was $362.

AMD

EPYC 7351

The EPYC 7351 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,226 points. Launch price was $1,100.

Processing Power

The Xeon W-1370 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7351 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7351 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1370 versus 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351 — a 55% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1370 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon W-1370 uses the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 7351 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-1370 scores 22,948 against the EPYC 7351's 23,226 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 7351. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1370 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351.

FeatureXeon W-1370EPYC 7351
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+76%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+21%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Rocket Lake-S (2021)
Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark
22,948
23,226+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-1370 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 7351 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W-1370EPYC 7351
Socket
LGA1200
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%