Xeon W-1370
VS
Ryzen 5 240

Xeon W-1370 vs Ryzen 5 240

Intel

Xeon W-1370

8 Cores16 Thrd80 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2021
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 240

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-1370

#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
102%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
100%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
98%
#130
EPYC 9115
MSRP: $726|Avg: $726
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($323) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W-1370 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W-1370Ryzen 5 240
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($323)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-S (2021) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 5 240 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($323 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W-1370Ryzen 5 240
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($323)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-1370 and Ryzen 5 240

Intel

Xeon W-1370

The Xeon W-1370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,948 points. Launch price was $362.

AMD

Ryzen 5 240

The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon W-1370 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 240 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W-1370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1370 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 — a 2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1370 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Xeon W-1370 uses the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-1370 scores 22,948 against the Ryzen 5 240's 23,167 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 240. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureXeon W-1370Ryzen 5 240
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+2%
5 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
4.3 GHz+48%
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
4 nm-71%
Architecture
Rocket Lake-S (2021)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
22,948
23,167
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-1370 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W-1370Ryzen 5 240
Socket
LGA1200
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon W-1370 launched at $323 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 240 debuted at $0. At current prices ($323 vs $0), the Ryzen 5 240 is $323 cheaper.

FeatureXeon W-1370Ryzen 5 240
MSRP
$323
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$323
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
71.0
Release Date
2021
2025