CPU
GPU
Xeon W-3225
Core Ultra 5 238V
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3225
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 238V
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3225 | Core Ultra 5 238V |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($850) | ✅ More affordable ($454) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3225 | Core Ultra 5 238V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+87%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($850) | ✅ More affordable ($454) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3225 and Core Ultra 5 238V
Xeon W-3225
The Xeon W-3225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,251 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Core Ultra 5 238V
The Core Ultra 5 238V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,219 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3225 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core Ultra 5 238V's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Xeon W-3225 versus 4.7 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 238V — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 238V (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon W-3225 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 238V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3225 scores 18,251 against the Core Ultra 5 238V's 18,219 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon W-3225. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,500 vs 10,000 (14% advantage for the Xeon W-3225). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,150 vs 2,683, a 80% lead for the Core Ultra 5 238V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,100 vs 10,130 (10.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 238V). L3 cache: 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3225 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 238V.
| Feature | Xeon W-3225 | Core Ultra 5 238V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+76% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16.5 MB+106% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+220% | 2.5 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| PassMark | 18,251 | 18,219 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,500+15% | 10,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,150 | 2,683+133% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,100 | 10,130+11% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3225 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 238V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3225 versus LPDDR5x-8533 on the Core Ultra 5 238V — the Core Ultra 5 238V supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3225 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3225) vs 2 (Core Ultra 5 238V). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3225) vs 8 (Core Ultra 5 238V) — the Xeon W-3225 offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon W-3225) and SoC (Core Ultra 5 238V).
| Feature | Xeon W-3225 | Core Ultra 5 238V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | FCBGA2833 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | LPDDR5x-8533+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB+3100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+700% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3225 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3225) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 238V). The Core Ultra 5 238V includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 130V), while the Xeon W-3225 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-3225 targets Workstation, Core Ultra 5 238V targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3225 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 2920X; Core Ultra 5 238V rivals Ryzen 5 8640U.
| Feature | Xeon W-3225 | Core Ultra 5 238V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Arc Graphics 130V |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation | Productivity |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W-3225 launched at $1319 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 238V debuted at $454. At current prices ($850 vs $454), the Core Ultra 5 238V is $396 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-3225 delivers 21.5 pts/$ vs 40.1 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 238V — making the Core Ultra 5 238V the 60.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W-3225 | Core Ultra 5 238V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1319 | $454-66% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $850 | $454-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5 | 40.1+87% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W-3225 and Core Ultra 5 238V
