Xeon W-3225 vs Core i7-13700K
Xeon W-3225
Core i7-13700K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3225
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13700K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3225 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($850) | ✅ More affordable ($400) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3225 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+433%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($850) | ✅ More affordable ($400) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3225 and Core i7-13700K
Xeon W-3225
The Xeon W-3225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,251 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3225 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Xeon W-3225 versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon W-3225 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3225 scores 18,251 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 86% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,500 vs 31,000 (91.8% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,150 vs 2,846, a 84.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,100 vs 18,980 (70.4% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3225 vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.
| Feature | Xeon W-3225 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+9% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16.5 MB | 30 MB (total)+82% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 18,251 | 45,784+151% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,500 | 31,000+170% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,150 | 2,846+147% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,100 | 18,980+109% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3225 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-13700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3225 versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3225 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3225) vs 2 (Core i7-13700K). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3225) vs 20 (Core i7-13700K) — the Xeon W-3225 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon W-3225) and Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K).
| Feature | Xeon W-3225 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB+433% | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+220% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3225 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3225) vs true (Core i7-13700K). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-3225 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-3225 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3225 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 2920X; Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Xeon W-3225 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | true |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W-3225 launched at $1319 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700K debuted at $409. At current prices ($850 vs $400), the Core i7-13700K is $450 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-3225 delivers 21.5 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700K — making the Core i7-13700K the 136.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W-3225 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1319 | $409-69% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $850 | $400-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5 | 114.5+433% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W-3225 and Core i7-13700K
